Established guidance or repeated evidence
Used for foundational decisions such as clear crisis boundaries, accessible interaction, general physical-activity inclusion and structured self-help principles.
Explore My Mind Is Ok
Evidence, safety and product governance
MMIO uses research, public guidance, product testing and explicit service boundaries to shape decisions. Evidence is represented in proportion to its strength; good intentions are not treated as proof.
MMIO is an independently operated Australian wellbeing education platform.
What “evidence-informed” means here
MMIO may use a technique supported in research, but a digital implementation can differ in dose, context, population, guidance and outcome. We therefore separate evidence for the underlying mechanism from evidence for the finished MMIO product.
Used for foundational decisions such as clear crisis boundaries, accessible interaction, general physical-activity inclusion and structured self-help principles.
Used where reviews or trials support a general method—such as implementation intentions—while MMIO avoids promising the same outcome.
Used as a testable design hypothesis when evidence is indirect, mixed or mainly from adjacent fields such as learning science or HCI.
Clinical scoring, passive sensing, crisis inference, AI interpretation and efficacy claims require a much higher evidence, governance and safety threshold.
A six-stage content and product lifecycle
MMIO’s goal is a traceable route from a proposed idea to a reviewed, tested and maintainable product decision.
State what the feature should help a person do, who it is not for and what it must not claim.
Prioritise systematic reviews, primary research, recognised standards and authoritative public-health sources.
Adapt language, dose and interaction to a self-guided non-clinical context without copying clinical authority the service does not hold.
Check cautions, escalation, data flows, accessibility, potential shame and ways a prompt could be unsafe in context.
Validate code, mobile layout, keyboard use, reduced motion, locked-content boundaries and realistic member journeys.
Monitor reliability and consented product outcomes, record adverse feedback and change or remove features that do not earn their place.
Claims discipline
The table below describes the current public-claim boundary. It does not replace formal legal, clinical or regulatory review.
| MMIO may say | “Evidence-informed,” “designed using research and guidance,” “structured self-guided wellbeing support,” and clear descriptions of what a tool asks a member to do. |
|---|---|
| MMIO should qualify | Statements about likely usefulness, engagement, learning, behaviour change or wellbeing—because average research findings do not guarantee an individual result. |
| MMIO should not say without direct evaluation | “Clinically proven,” “treats anxiety or depression,” “prevents crisis,” “equivalent to therapy,” or that completion produces a medical or psychological outcome. |
| MMIO does not do | Diagnosis, clinical assessment, nursing consultation, medication advice, risk monitoring, crisis detection or personalised treatment recommendations. |
| Independent rights remain | Nothing in product wording is intended to remove consumer rights, urgent-care needs or the role of appropriately qualified professionals. |
Privacy architecture
MMIO separates account and access information from private working content. Sensitive reflections generally remain in the browser unless a feature clearly states another flow and receives an explicit action.
Notes, plans, favourites and practice state can remain on the member’s current device.
Identity, access, security and billing records are used to operate membership—not to create a clinical profile.
Copying or downloading a toolkit is controlled by the member and can be reviewed before sharing.
Local privacy means work may not follow a member to another browser and can be lost when data is cleared.
Safety and accessibility
MMIO aims to make relevant cautions visible at the point of use, keep urgent support separate from business contact and test interaction across keyboard, touch, mobile and reduced-motion settings. Automated checks are useful but cannot replace co-design and testing with people who use assistive technologies or experience cognitive and sensory barriers.
Private entries are not watched for crisis language. Immediate danger requires 000 or an appropriate crisis service.
Boundary, relationship, movement, sleep and body-notice tools include cautions where a generic prompt could be unsafe.
Members can choose a smaller route, leave a question blank or stop without losing progress.
Keyboard focus, touch targets, readable structure, reduced motion and responsive layouts are built into release checks.
Australian urgent and ongoing-care pathways remain visible when self-guided support is not enough.
Accessibility, safety and adverse feedback should have clear ownership and a route into product change.
Current source anchors
These sources guide governance and design decisions. Individual MMIO tools also require their own source notes, review dates and implementation rationale.
Governance, partnering with consumers and model-of-care considerations for digital mental health services.
Authoritative guidance on scaling structured psychological self-help delivered through digital and other formats.
The current W3C Recommendation used as a technical and design benchmark for web accessibility.
Australian emergency and crisis-service information used to keep urgent pathways separate and current.
Transparency
Explore the product system, read the service boundaries and use the free experience before deciding whether membership is right for you.
Display preferences
Text size
Your display choices stay in this browser and are not sent to My Mind Is Ok.